Author Topic: Myth: Mineral vs Synthetic EO  (Read 26658 times)

HumbleCar

  • Guest
Re: Myth: Mineral vs Synthetic EO
« Reply #20 on: September 18, 2008, 10:37:49 PM »
reset ECU then ...  ;)

Never do it before.  How to do huh?  Go back TCM?

Offline clarence

  • Max Torque (4400 rpm)
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,579
Re: Myth: Mineral vs Synthetic EO
« Reply #21 on: September 19, 2008, 12:28:02 AM »
Advisable.

Offline detach8

  • Low End (2000 rpm)
  • **
  • Posts: 259
Re: Myth: Mineral vs Synthetic EO
« Reply #22 on: September 19, 2008, 01:47:41 AM »
Follow this guide. It's safe and it works:
http://forum.thelatioclub.org/index.php?topic=6305.0

Jo_Lee

  • Guest
Re: Myth: Mineral vs Synthetic EO
« Reply #23 on: September 29, 2008, 11:18:33 AM »
I got my ride during the CNY promotion which includes free servicing up to 20K km, including EO.  Hence, the 10K free servicing using synthetic oil is from TCM foc.  Was told by TCM staff that if not during the promotion period and did not get the NPMP promotion package, have to top-up $74 to use its in-house synthetic oil.  Otherwise, TCM will use mineral oil for the third free servicing (i.e. 10K servicing).

i think i kenna "ke-tok" by TCM..they charged me $82 instead of $74 for their in-house
synthetic oil during my 10K servicing  :mad:

HumbleCar

  • Guest
Re: Myth: Mineral vs Synthetic EO
« Reply #24 on: September 29, 2008, 11:33:36 AM »
i think i kenna "ke-tok" by TCM..they charged me $82 instead of $74 for their in-house
synthetic oil during my 10K servicing  :mad:

Should be $74 leh (inclusive of GST).  I still have the "bill" with me.  (TCM charged me the EO and I told them of the CNY promotion and they said "Sorry, mistake.  You don't need to pay.")  Unless TCM has increased the price now.  My price was about month ago leh.  In fact, at that time, I planned to get my own EO if I have to top up.  Many forumers feel that getting own EO is better than use the one from TCM.
« Last Edit: September 29, 2008, 11:35:27 AM by HumbleCar »

Jo_Lee

  • Guest
Re: Myth: Mineral vs Synthetic EO
« Reply #25 on: September 29, 2008, 01:21:12 PM »
i juz sent for servicing last sat...dun tell me price increased so much in 1 mth  :scared: aiyo..

Offline Lorddraco

  • Honorary MG
  • Max Torque (4400 rpm)
  • *
  • Posts: 2,078
  • Lorddraco aka Avatar
  • Car Color: Light Greyish Blue
Re: Myth: Mineral vs Synthetic EO
« Reply #26 on: September 29, 2008, 02:26:24 PM »
they increase it everynow and then.
Car Changed .. No more Latio.....

HumbleCar

  • Guest
Re: Myth: Mineral vs Synthetic EO
« Reply #27 on: September 29, 2008, 08:36:52 PM »
i juz sent for servicing last sat...dun tell me price increased so much in 1 mth  :scared: aiyo..
What is new here?  The price of newspapers on 30 Sept and 1 Oct also different.  In terms of percentage, the increase is more than 10%.

Offline rocket

  • Idling (800 rpm)
  • *
  • Posts: 134
Re: Myth: Mineral vs Synthetic EO
« Reply #28 on: September 29, 2008, 10:10:04 PM »
What is new here?  The price of newspapers on 30 Sept and 1 Oct also different.  In terms of percentage, the increase is more than 10%.

electricity bills will go up more than 22%, compare 30 Sept and 1 Oct :crycry: : :hammer:

Offline Jazz

  • Max Torque (4400 rpm)
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,097
Re: Myth: Mineral vs Synthetic EO
« Reply #29 on: September 29, 2008, 11:55:03 PM »
i think i kenna "ke-tok" by TCM..they charged me $82 instead of $74 for their in-house
synthetic oil during my 10K servicing  :mad:

Maybe they used Shogun instead of Fastflo. I dunno just guessing.  :smile:

HumbleCar

  • Guest
Re: Myth: Mineral vs Synthetic EO
« Reply #30 on: September 29, 2008, 11:58:15 PM »
Maybe they used Shogun instead of Fastflo. I dunno just guessing.  :smile:
My case was fasflo EO.

Offline Jazz

  • Max Torque (4400 rpm)
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,097
Re: Myth: Mineral vs Synthetic EO
« Reply #31 on: September 30, 2008, 12:06:13 AM »
My case was fasflo EO.

So you only paid $74. But Bro Jo_lee may be using Shogun.  :smile:

HumbleCar

  • Guest
Re: Myth: Mineral vs Synthetic EO
« Reply #32 on: September 30, 2008, 12:09:33 AM »
So you only paid $74. But Bro Jo_lee may be using Shogun.  :smile:
That is possible.  (Actually I got it FOC as this is part of the CNY promotion package which comes with free servicing of up to 20K km, inclusive of synthetic EO.)

Jo_Lee

  • Guest
Re: Myth: Mineral vs Synthetic EO
« Reply #33 on: September 30, 2008, 10:42:45 AM »
So you only paid $74. But Bro Jo_lee may be using Shogun.  :smile:

maybe lor..i didnt ask what brand is the EO used and invoice also never indicate
the brand..but there is a fastflo sticker on the windscreen so i think shld be
fastflo..now gotta monitor FC..if not much diff then ok lor.

btw, me sis hor..not bro lah  :bleh:
« Last Edit: September 30, 2008, 12:56:14 PM by Jo_Lee »

Jo_Lee

  • Guest
Re: Myth: Mineral vs Synthetic EO
« Reply #34 on: October 13, 2008, 04:26:01 PM »
haiz...u r right humblecar...FC indeed drop after 10K service...juz finished my 2nd tank after 10k service last mth..
travelling and driving pattern all the same but FC dropped from 14km/l to 12.9km/l....haiz..

Offline iagree

  • High End (5000 rpm)
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,621
  • iagree!
Re: Myth: Mineral vs Synthetic EO
« Reply #35 on: October 13, 2008, 05:46:17 PM »
My case was fasflo EO.

Hi humbercar

fasflo good?

fasflo  vs  REV 1?
sorry, i must agree because i don't know how to disagree. agreeeee only....

from
   -iagree, must agree

Offline Jazz

  • Max Torque (4400 rpm)
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,097
Re: Myth: Mineral vs Synthetic EO
« Reply #36 on: October 13, 2008, 09:58:53 PM »
maybe lor..i didnt ask what brand is the EO used and invoice also never indicate
the brand..but there is a fastflo sticker on the windscreen so i think shld be
fastflo..now gotta monitor FC..if not much diff then ok lor.

btw, me sis hor..not bro lah  :bleh:

Hello Sis,

Are you the same person in HWZ ?  :smile:

Jo_Lee

  • Guest
Re: Myth: Mineral vs Synthetic EO
« Reply #37 on: October 14, 2008, 10:53:40 AM »
Hello Sis,

Are you the same person in HWZ ?  :smile:

yes yes  :cool2:

HumbleCar

  • Guest
Re: Myth: Mineral vs Synthetic EO
« Reply #38 on: October 14, 2008, 11:46:28 AM »
Hi humbercar

fasflo good?

fasflo  vs  REV 1?

Hi Bro,  I have not tried REV 1 so cannot comment.  But fasflo is giving me worse FC than even mineral EO, and I don't find it that smooth.  Thought it should be better FC than mineral EO leh.  Dunno what's wrong.  Is it EO or my car?  Sigh.
« Last Edit: October 14, 2008, 11:58:37 AM by HumbleCar »

Offline limck007

  • Moderators
  • Mid Zone (3000 rpm)
  • *
  • Posts: 1,016
Re: Myth: Mineral vs Synthetic EO
« Reply #39 on: October 14, 2008, 01:20:58 PM »
Hi Bro,  I have not tried REV 1 so cannot comment.  But fasflo is giving me worse FC than even mineral EO, and I don't find it that smooth.  Thought it should be better FC than mineral EO leh.  Dunno what's wrong.  Is it EO or my car?  Sigh.

hmm then overall>> even though fastflo is FREE during servicing, i think it is still better to top up to shogun or Armsoil or Redline EO.

At least spend money on EO, hoping that the FC can be better ==> save petrol $$ for the next 10000km.

is redline EO better than Armsoil?