Author Topic: RPM Vs The Best FC  (Read 14763 times)

Offline Ying

  • Mid Zone (3000 rpm)
  • ***
  • Posts: 845
Re: RPM Vs The Best FC
« Reply #20 on: February 19, 2009, 09:19:02 AM »
how about other 1.5L AT car travel 120~140km Melaka round trip. Anyone have data to compare?

Offline LatioR

  • Low End (2000 rpm)
  • **
  • Posts: 449
Re: RPM Vs The Best FC
« Reply #21 on: February 20, 2009, 12:21:10 AM »
Bro i second that of driving too slow is bad for FC....for me i feel the optimum speed range is 80-100km/hr on ur highest gear ratio :thumbsup: attach is what i am getting in sg for my half tank :bleh:

hi bro fri13th, ever try 70km/h and what's the FC? Not sure what the best Gear Ratio for latio premium (anyone can help especially those with "trip metre", i guess) :confused1:

Offline LatioR

  • Low End (2000 rpm)
  • **
  • Posts: 449
Re: RPM Vs The Best FC
« Reply #22 on: February 25, 2009, 12:55:37 AM »
Bro i second that of driving too slow is bad for FC....for me i feel the optimum speed range is 80-100km/hr on ur highest gear ratio :thumbsup: attach is what i am getting in sg for my half tank :bleh:

Hi Bro fri13th/all, hv try to go for very slow speed (targetted speed ~100km/h and will vary from 70 ~110km/h depending on up slope or down slope) on NSHW last weekends. Pls. find below for the updates with photos taken:~

1. With 90% HS and 10% town area -> able to hit 170km+ when reaching 3/4 mark

2. Continue to drive at kampung+city area (100%) -> hit 310km+ when reaching 1/2 mark

3. On my way back to Sg, again on slow speed, hit 480km+ when reaching Skudai toll (=> able to hit >200km from 1/2 mark to 1/4 mark with this slow speed) and hit 503km+ (b4 reaching 1/4 mark) when top up petrol at station which is very near to JB, abt 2km from JB chkpts.

**In short, with above, hit 16.85km+/l and again, I'm able to hit >19km/l should I consider 100% NSHW driving (which I did if b4 on my way back from Penang during CNY period).

Offline LatioR

  • Low End (2000 rpm)
  • **
  • Posts: 449
Re: RPM Vs The Best FC
« Reply #23 on: February 25, 2009, 12:59:17 AM »
To attached more photos~2

Offline LatioR

  • Low End (2000 rpm)
  • **
  • Posts: 449
Re: RPM Vs The Best FC
« Reply #24 on: February 25, 2009, 01:01:06 AM »
More photos~3

Offline Jazz

  • Max Torque (4400 rpm)
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,097
Re: RPM Vs The Best FC
« Reply #25 on: February 25, 2009, 05:08:54 PM »
More photos~3

Bro LatioR,

Hate to see this type of pictures. ha ha ha.

Anyway.  :thumbsup:

Offline maxngck

  • Mid Zone (3000 rpm)
  • ***
  • Posts: 653
Re: RPM Vs The Best FC
« Reply #26 on: February 25, 2009, 05:31:02 PM »
Bro LatioR,

Hate to see this type of pictures. ha ha ha.

Anyway.  :thumbsup:

hahahaaa.....having the same sentiment  :bleh:

Offline LatioR

  • Low End (2000 rpm)
  • **
  • Posts: 449
Re: RPM Vs The Best FC
« Reply #27 on: February 26, 2009, 10:26:57 PM »
hahahaaa.....having the same sentiment  :bleh:

Aiya..me also same in local, FC very bad, so far the best FC in local = 14km/l (with avg 12~13km/l). Still hv long way to achieve the better FC in local (try to set target at 14 ~15km/l). I'm quite sure all the lations can achieve better FC should u follow the methods I mentioned abv (which to me is considered Damn slow, eg. my formal car, 16.5 yrs cars never drive at such speed ~100km/h b4 instead normally drive at 120~140km/h of cos with the FC at 12km/l)

Offline LatioR

  • Low End (2000 rpm)
  • **
  • Posts: 449
Re: RPM Vs The Best FC
« Reply #28 on: March 17, 2009, 11:40:30 PM »
More photos~3

My last FC during last weekends is at 18.91km/l on NSHW (at 95% HW, hit 377km+ at 1/2 tank mark).