Author Topic: FC challenge  (Read 18797 times)

Offline mindman

  • Mid Zone (3000 rpm)
  • ***
  • Posts: 493
FC challenge
« on: May 02, 2009, 12:10:45 PM »

Offline QQman78

  • Idling (800 rpm)
  • *
  • Posts: 124
Re: FC challenge
« Reply #1 on: May 03, 2009, 04:31:08 PM »

Offline liewks

  • Idling (800 rpm)
  • *
  • Posts: 104
Re: FC challenge
« Reply #2 on: May 04, 2009, 11:04:53 PM »
Very interested... but unlikely to be able to find time. But for those who can make it, it's going to be really fun. Plus maybe Tan Chong is going to program the ECM for maximum fuel economy for you :-). All for free...

Offline SoL

  • Low End (2000 rpm)
  • **
  • Posts: 219
Re: FC challenge
« Reply #3 on: May 04, 2009, 11:20:12 PM »
Whats the minimum speed you have to drive? Else I'll be chugging along at 60km/h heheh.

Offline liewks

  • Idling (800 rpm)
  • *
  • Posts: 104
Re: FC challenge
« Reply #4 on: May 04, 2009, 11:44:45 PM »
Take a look at the schedule...

Flag-off at 7am, lunch at 11am. 4 hours, 250km... works out to 62.5km/hr. Doing 70km/hr on our speedo should work out great. Maybe about 23~25km/L with windows up and no A/C? Those with FL versions may get a little more? I wonder if 4AT will out perform a CVT under these conditions?

Offline SoL

  • Low End (2000 rpm)
  • **
  • Posts: 219
Re: FC challenge
« Reply #5 on: May 05, 2009, 12:19:30 AM »
Why would FL be getting more fuel economy?   :confused1: Better ECU/TCU tuning?

Also, i thought CVT is more fuel efficient then 4AT, cruising rpm of CVT is lower isn't it? 100km/h on 4AT is 2.5k rpm, while its just 2k rpm on CVT.

Offline sword28

  • Low End (2000 rpm)
  • **
  • Posts: 153
Re: FC challenge
« Reply #6 on: May 05, 2009, 10:28:44 AM »
i interested to join... but hor ...my FC is not gd, in spore i have never hit 500km in one tank before ... then how huh?
only top up once before set off? :confused1: ...
they mention after the first top up, they will seal the fuel tank and only unseal after the challenge.
so low FC car cannot join? :confused1:

Offline SoL

  • Low End (2000 rpm)
  • **
  • Posts: 219
Re: FC challenge
« Reply #7 on: May 05, 2009, 11:13:40 AM »
Well, you can try!  :thumbsup:

I dunno whats the standard in Singapore, but liewks' 20+ km/l is probably a very high standard.

Offline liewks

  • Idling (800 rpm)
  • *
  • Posts: 104
Re: FC challenge
« Reply #8 on: May 05, 2009, 12:12:09 PM »
I think FL has extended late closure for intake valves. This will improve low load fuel economy. But I can't be sure.

As you say, it looks like low load, low speed cruising should favour CVT. But again, it's difficult to find any published efficiency numbers for the two drive trains.

It would be interesting if they allowed other folks to attend the pre-event briefing just to pick up tips for driving efficiently. The best people to learn it from are Nissan. They know how the engines and transmissions are set up and where the sweet spots are.

Why would FL be getting more fuel economy?   :confused1: Better ECU/TCU tuning?

Also, i thought CVT is more fuel efficient then 4AT, cruising rpm of CVT is lower isn't it? 100km/h on 4AT is 2.5k rpm, while its just 2k rpm on CVT.

Offline whattafarck

  • Idling (800 rpm)
  • *
  • Posts: 75
  • BaldOThe5thOfJuly
Re: FC challenge
« Reply #9 on: May 05, 2009, 03:29:25 PM »
FC Challenge...
i got this email from Tan Chong too...
tempted to join...but as others...time constraint for me too.
i have never been able to hit 15km/l...mu best is about 14km+...
maybe can take out the spare tyre...no aircon....lose more weight...heheheh..
it says in the email...thos who join...will get free oil & filter servicing...
for $50 registration fee....not a bad deal!
What Is Understood, Need Not Be Discussed.

Offline Silver

  • Mid Zone (3000 rpm)
  • ***
  • Posts: 900
Re: FC challenge
« Reply #10 on: May 05, 2009, 03:50:16 PM »
it is free with $5,000 in prizes

the $50 is a refundable deposit to ensure that those who signed up actually participate

sounds interesting

tempted to go - can be company to whoever is interested to drive

(weight is 78 kg)
Be safe. Go with the flo.

Offline tchekchuan

  • Low End (2000 rpm)
  • **
  • Posts: 299
Re: FC challenge
« Reply #11 on: May 05, 2009, 03:57:52 PM »
Can we do any modification on our car for fuel efficiency ?

Everyone the winner!

Offline Jazz

  • Max Torque (4400 rpm)
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,097
Re: FC challenge
« Reply #12 on: May 05, 2009, 04:14:55 PM »
So how do they measure the FC ?

Offline SoL

  • Low End (2000 rpm)
  • **
  • Posts: 219
Re: FC challenge
« Reply #13 on: May 05, 2009, 04:21:43 PM »
So how do they measure the FC ?

Probably by how much petrol they give you/ how much you use.

Offline Jazz

  • Max Torque (4400 rpm)
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,097
Re: FC challenge
« Reply #14 on: May 05, 2009, 04:30:47 PM »
Probably by how much petrol they give you/ how much you use.

Yep, that why this puzzle me, since the distance is so called fixed, to and fro around 500km as stated, let say they provide us to pump to the full tank since we need to abide the 3/4 tank regulation also. So after end of the journey, how do they or use any equipment to measure the quantity of our fuel left to determine the winner, we know we can estimate from our fuel gauge but not accurate in term of how many litres left in our tank.

Offline hwlee

  • Mid Zone (3000 rpm)
  • ***
  • Posts: 681
  • Honda
Re: FC challenge
« Reply #15 on: May 05, 2009, 05:19:36 PM »
Yep, that why this puzzle me, since the distance is so called fixed, to and fro around 500km as stated, let say they provide us to pump to the full tank since we need to abide the 3/4 tank regulation also. So after end of the journey, how do they or use any equipment to measure the quantity of our fuel left to determine the winner, we know we can estimate from our fuel gauge but not accurate in term of how many litres left in our tank.

This challenge is to see how far you can go with 1 tank of fuel. No need to worry on that 3/4 tank regulation...cos you vehicle petrol tank will be refueling and sealed at Gelang Patah on 6am.

I think TCM assume Latio is able to go at least 500km++ with full tank. Besides, you will be driving at highway (mostly). Can have chance to see how good is your latio fuel consumption. Too bad I am not qualified to the challenge. Hope who participant can enjoy.

Offline latioboy91

  • High End (5000 rpm)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,738
  • No More Latio, Doesn't Mean I'm NO more a Lation.
Re: FC challenge
« Reply #16 on: May 05, 2009, 05:32:43 PM »
it is free with $5,000 in prizes

the $50 is a refundable deposit to ensure that those who signed up actually participate

sounds interesting

tempted to go - can be company to whoever is interested to drive

(weight is 78 kg)

silver you drive i go lah
Modifications are NEVER ending only if your wallet's money is NEVER ending.

One must learn how to control his spending on MODIFICATIONS. (:

BUT, i dun care. So? MODIFICATIONS IS YES FOR ME!

Offline Silver

  • Mid Zone (3000 rpm)
  • ***
  • Posts: 900
Re: FC challenge
« Reply #17 on: May 05, 2009, 05:39:49 PM »
Cannot because I wanted to be the passenger

Mine also not qualified, only 13+ km/l, so thought of joining the fun with "qualified" Lations ..........
Be safe. Go with the flo.

Offline Jazz

  • Max Torque (4400 rpm)
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,097
Re: FC challenge
« Reply #18 on: May 05, 2009, 06:16:19 PM »
This challenge is to see how far you can go with 1 tank of fuel. No need to worry on that 3/4 tank regulation...cos you vehicle petrol tank will be refueling and sealed at Gelang Patah on 6am.

I think TCM assume Latio is able to go at least 500km++ with full tank. Besides, you will be driving at highway (mostly). Can have chance to see how good is your latio fuel consumption. Too bad I am not qualified to the challenge. Hope who participant can enjoy.

Oh I see, so this challenge to see 1 tank can cover the distance.

Offline SoL

  • Low End (2000 rpm)
  • **
  • Posts: 219
Re: FC challenge
« Reply #19 on: May 05, 2009, 06:24:58 PM »
23rd May, I got reservist on that day. =(

I'm not a Nissan Advantage member anyway, so cannot join.  :(